Press statement

Geoffroy de Laforcade, faculty advisor  recognized by The INNOVATOR

February 16, 2001

I had been the faculty advisor to the Governors State University (GSU) newspaper, the INNOVATOR, for nearly a year when Jeni Porche and Margaret Hosty became editor-in-chief and managing editor, respectively. I had submitted frequent articles and columns to the paper, and worked hard with my colleagues to improve the medium and encourage student interest in it. Neither my reliability and commitment, nor my credentials as an educator and former professional journalist, were ever called into question. Accordingly, when my contract came up for renewal, the new editorial team entrusted me with their support, which was ratified by the Student Communications Media Board (SCMB) and by the Dean of Student Life, Patricia Carter.

Under the leadership of the new editors, the INNOVATOR made great strides as a serious newspaper and a voice for students' interests. It gained contributors and readership, and was thoroughly reorganized thanks to the professionalism and acute management skills of these students. I dedicated a lot of time to the newspaper and watched it blossom into something better than it ever had been. Aside from the talent and honesty of the editors, what struck me most was their willingness to inform to the best of their abilities on issues of concern to the entire campus community. They held the faculty, staff, and administration to the very standards of excellence set forth in the university's regulations and mission statement. Their goal was to create a durable, well-managed, and reliable newspaper with something in it for all those involved with GSU.

The students faced innumerable obstacles, ranging from frequent equipment failures and a legacy of poor record-keeping to office break-ins and procedural incoherence in the functioning of the SCMB. They worked hard to fix these problems, held their writers to high standards and strict deadlines, and produced a highly improved newspaper. As soon as they began reporting anomalies and informing the public of student grievances, however, they faced obstruction and intimidation, leading to outright harassment and culminating in the clear pattern of prior constraint (and prior review) for which they are now demanding redress.

As their advisor, I witnessed these difficulties first-hand, and can attest to the editors' truthfulness as well as to their commitment to the best interests of this public institution of higher learning. They have

paid a huge price, as students, for their integrity and service to the community.

I have also been treated condescendingly by university president Stuart Fagan's administration, which never once contacted me to discuss issues or controversies pertaining to the newspaper, and which ignored my efforts to enter into a dialogue with them whenever the editors ran into difficulties (caused in most cases by the actions of the university against the newspaper). When Roger Oden, the Dean of Arts and  Sciences, publicly defamed the newspaper and cited me by name as being untruthful, Fagan and the new provost, Dr. Paul Keys, did not acknowledge my concern, nor did they attempt to intervene in a constructive fashion. On the contrary, Fagan published an open letter reiterating Oden's unsubstantiated condemnation of the INNOVATOR's ethics, in which my professionalism as advisor was implicitly called into question.

    The university attorney, Alexis Kennedy, to whom I introduced myself uninvited, contacted me only once to relay opinions voiced by a few students regarding an aspect of editorial policy.  In this instance, she seemed to suggest that I convey to the editors the administration’s anger at the paper’s reluctance to publish inflammatory criticisms of the INNOVATOR.  The editors had merely written to to the authors of the letters suggesting that they amend libelous portions of their submissions prior to publication.  Thus, I either received contact from the university’s attorney on behalf of students, whom she does not represent, or Ms. Kennedy was attempting to interfere directly with editorial decisions, in which I play no part.  At no other time did Fagan, Keys, or Carter address me as advisor or seek me out to discuss matters pertaining to the newspaper.  I have since been arbitrarily and improperly notified by Dean Carter that my services are no longer needed at GSU.  The editors and the SCMB were never informed of this highly irregular executive decision until Donald Bell (the administrative liaison appointed by Carter to the SCMB), who had made it a habit of scheduling and canceling meetings at whim, finally became exasperated with my habit of attending such meetings and had me expelled under the threat of the use of force.  As far as I am concerned, the editors regard me as their advisor, and I continue to perform the work of advisor.  I will not step down until the university admits to its improprieties, establishes procedural transparency, and allows the paper to publish freely.

It is no accident that the newspaper is prevented from appearing and playing its role at a time when another accreditation scandal has compromised the future of dozens of students in the Masters of Social Work program. The student editors will be fully vindicated when GSU is forced to answer in court to its unethical and illegal procedures against the INNOVATOR. As advisor, and as a former full-time instructor at GSU, I hope and believe that my efforts in support of the students' rights will ultimately prevail. I have witnessed persistent hypocrisy and bad faith, reckless administration and moral corruption to a degree that is absolutely unthinkable at a public university that prides itself in being "student-oriented". 

Contrary to some of the more ill-intentioned claims made by the students' adversaries, at no time have I attempted to use my position as advisor to discredit the programs or administrators of GSU. On the contrary, I full expected, when I accepted the position, to be recognized for contributing to the best of my abilities to the sound functioning of the student media and to the quality of the learning environment at GSU. Jeni Porche and Margaret Hosty have done their utmost to perform their jobs well, and I am honored that they continue to entrust me with the role of advisor to the INNOVATOR.